I hold any writer sufficiently justified who is himself in love with his theme.
One of the most common struggles in writing a literature review seems to be determining what the themes should be. There are probably many ways to figure this out, but I am going to describe two of them.
1. Using what you want to know. Sometimes writers will use the questions they have about a topic to determine their themes. For example, when Sally decided that she was interested in using differentiation for her lit review topic, she had several questions she wanted to answer about differentiation: What are the benefits for students? What are the benefits for teachers? What are different ways that the curriculum can be differentiated? Are there some specific strategies that I could learn? She kept those questions in mind as she read through her research, marking things she found that were relevant to each question.
2. Letting the research determine the themes. What if Sally knew that she wanted to research differentiation, but wasn't sure what themes she should select? Well, then she should let her research help her decide what the themes are. As Sally reads, she finds that many articles discuss the need for differentiation, the benefits for students, and the different ways that content can be differentiated. Because she has seen these themes again and again in her research, she decides to use them as her lit review themes.
Another common question is how broad or narrow to make the themes. This is also a decision that you get to make. In the two examples above, Sally found enough research to write about three broad themes on her topic. She may decide in the end, however, that she is more interested in just one of those themes and wants to devote her lit review work only to the different ways that content can be differentiated. In this case, she would take that theme and subdivide it into more the more narrow themes: differentiating by process, differentiating by content, differentiating by product. She now has narrowed the topic of her paper from "Differentiation" to "Ways to Differentiate" and both the title and introduction of her lit review should reflect that.
Other examples could include taking the broad topic of "Reading Comprehension" where you might address why it is necessary, ways to assess, and strategies for improving and narrowing the focus to "Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension." In this narrower topic, your themes might each be a different strategy that you will describe and explain how to use in the classroom.
The long and short of it is that there is no one right depth at which to address your topic. If you are in love with your theme, then you will determine what you want to know - whether that is more of a broad overview or a narrower look at one aspect.
Kelly,
ReplyDeleteI am so sorry to bother you about theme questions again. I thought I had decided on 3 themes of...Strategies for effectively teaching literacy, strategies for incorporating technology, and professional development as a strategy for improving the instruction received by ELLs. As I continue working on my lit review, the importance and amount of research on the two themes of Strategies for effectively teaching literacy and professional development as a strategy for improving the instruction received by ELLs seem to be taking over. I know we had talked about the possibility of only using 2 themes but I was wondering your thought on just focusing on these two. Please let me know what you think. Thanks again!
Jillian
Jillian,
ReplyDeletePlease don't apologize! This is a whole new kind of writing and I know it isn't easy to decide how to put it all together. I think that your first theme of strategies is a pretty big one - and many papers would just use three different strategies for the three themes, so I can see why it's getting big. You definitely will have enough to just use two themes - and if you want to slip a technology strategy into your first theme, you can do that, too!
Great! I have one that discusses technology to teach literacy that will be perfect there. Thanks so much!
ReplyDelete